Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Poole
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1988No. 17384PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
203 Cal.App.3d 1 (1988)
249 Cal. Rptr. 842
RONALD B. MITCHELL, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ERNESTINE POOLE, Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. 17384.
Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.
February 25, 1988.
COUNSEL
Katz & Block and Roderick T. Field for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
NEWMAN, J.
This cause having been submitted for decision, and fully considered, judgment is ordered as follows:
The judgment is reversed. Appellant to recover costs on appeal.(1) (See fn. 1.), (2) Appellant contends the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Votaw Precision Tool Co. v. Air CanadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- In Re Marriage of SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Appel v. BeyerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1974
- Berry v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller & Desatnik Management Co. v. BullockAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1990
- Anchor Pacifica Management Co. v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012