Appel v. Beyer
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLMES, Acting P. J.
These cases present the question, novel to the California appellate courts, whether housing projects carried out by joint participation of private enterprise and government under section 221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. § 17151(d)(3)) and section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 (Pub. L. No. 89-117, Aug. 10, 1965, 12 U.S.C. § 1701s) involve such “state action” that due process of law, including notice and proof of good cause for eviction, must be accorded a tenant who holds over after expiration of the agreed term of his tenancy.1…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Carroll v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- Gallman v. PierceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Green v. Copperstone Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.