Legal Opinion
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1995No. C6-94-742PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
Plaintiff-respondent Cheri Dietrich (“plaintiff’), an employee of Canadian-Pacific Ltd., d/b/a Soo Line Railroad Company (“Soo Line”), brought suit under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. §§ 363.03, 181.81 (1990), against Soo Line, plaintiffs former manager, Vern Graham, and the vice-president of plaintiffs former department, Robert Tisdall, alleging age discrimination and reprisal regarding the abolition of her job position and related training and hiring opportunities. The trial court granted Soo Line’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing both…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Barnes v. GenCorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Earl HOLLEY, Appellee, v. SANYO MANUFACTURING, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Sharilyn Haggenmiller v. ABM Parking Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Carr v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Mandy Liles v. C.S. McCrossan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.