Legal Opinion

Getz v. Whisenant

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1949No. Civ. 16787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

By virtue of a writ of attachment issued in this action, the sheriff took possession of a 1948 Hudson automobile. Kenneth F. Williams and Violet E. Williams instituted third party claim proceedings, asserting ownership and right of possession of the automobile. Judgment was in their favor, and plaintiff appeals therefrom.

Appellant asserts that the evidence does not support the judgment.

Defendant Whisenant was a salesman for Mr. Van Norman, who was a building contractor. On March 29, 1948, Mr. and Mrs. Williams, after having had negotiations with defendant as such salesman, entered into a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louis & Diederich, Inc. v. Cambridge European Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Lawler v. SolusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Dot Records, Inc. v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API