Dot Records, Inc. v. Freeman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem. *
The plaintiff has appealed from the order, in this third party claim proceeding, which adjudicated that the Cadillac attached in the main action belonged to the third party claimants and not to the defendant. The defendant was the owner and in possession in November 1963, when she transferred title to the two claimants. Plaintiff contends that the transfer was without effect as to its attachment because it was one in semblance only, and also because it must be con clusively presumed fraudulent because of noncompliance with the requirements of section 3440, Civil Code. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern California Collection Co. v. NapkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Shepherd v. GambleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hepner v. HepnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Weil v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Getz v. WhisenantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wheelon v. Patco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968