Legal Opinion

Davey v. Unitil Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 28, 1991No. 90-043PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from a Superior Court (Perkins, J.) decision denying the plaintiff’s petition for injunctive relief. The *835plaintiff, John M. Davey, sought an order compelling the defendant, Unitil Corporation (Unitil), to give him the company’s shareholder list. The trial court ruled that Davey lacked a “proper purpose,” see RSA 293-A.-52, for examining the list and therefore denied Davey’s request. We reverse.

The material facts of this case are not in dispute. Davey owns 335 shares of stock in Unitil, a New Hampshire public utility corporation. He bought 235 shares in September 1988 at…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. CM & M GROUP, INC. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Crane Co. v. Anaconda Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PorterieSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  4. A & K Railroad Materials, Inc. v. Green Bay & Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1977
  5. Hanrahan v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. NelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. City of Franklin, Tennessee v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. Hoepner v. Wachovia Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2001
  5. Stilwell Partners, L.P. v. Seneca-Cayuga Bancorp, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API