Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
1. Pursuant to Rule 12-102 NMRA 1996, Defendant-Appellant Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative (“NORA”), seeks review of a decision from the First Judicial District Court. At trial, the district court decided in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Maureen Schein, granting her mandamus action and requiring that NORA allow Schein access to its legal billing records as a member of NORA We review two issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court erred in permitting access to the records, and 2) whether the resulting writ exceeded the permissible scope of mandamus. As to the first…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gaughan v. NATIONAL CUTTING HORSE ASS'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Kerr v. ParsonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- Mimbres Valley Irrigation Co. v. SalopekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lang v. Western Providers Physician Organization, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Collier v. N.M. Livestock Bd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.