Legal Opinion

Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1997No. 23333PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

1. Pursuant to Rule 12-102 NMRA 1996, Defendant-Appellant Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative (“NORA”), seeks review of a decision from the First Judicial District Court. At trial, the district court decided in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Maureen Schein, granting her mandamus action and requiring that NORA allow Schein access to its legal billing records as a member of NORA We review two issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court erred in permitting access to the records, and 2) whether the resulting writ exceeded the permissible scope of mandamus. As to the first…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gaughan v. NATIONAL CUTTING HORSE ASS'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  2. Kerr v. ParsonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Mimbres Valley Irrigation Co. v. SalopekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Lang v. Western Providers Physician Organization, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Collier v. N.M. Livestock Bd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API