Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this action for medical monitoring of the residents of a geographic area affected by defendants’ toxic chemical discharge, the question before us is whether plaintiffs, in moving for class certification, have met their burden of demonstrating that common issues of law and fact predominate. We conclude they have not. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
Background
Plaintiffs Roslyn Carrillo et alia allege that defendants Lockheed Martin Corporation et alia, in the course of conducting manufacturing operations in the City of Redlands, beginning in 1954,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.