Legal Opinion

Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 17, 2004No. 03-7360PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be AFFIRMED.

Familiarity is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

Throughout the 1970s, Keene Corporation (“Keene”) was a conglomerate that owned, among other things, an insulation business that once manufactured and sold asbestos-containing products. Between *2771981 and 1988, Keene engaged in a corporate restructuring in which it first created appellee-defendant Bairnco Corporation (“Bairnco”), and, through a “drop down” merger, became…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. SchneiderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Kipperman v. Onex Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  5. Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API