Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Pickering

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1988No. 18384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

Appellant Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers) issued to respondent Pickering three separate policies of automobile insurance. Each policy provided $10,000 in medical benefits. Pickering was later involved in an automobile accident and incurred medical bills of more than $30,000. When Pickering attempted to recover medical benefits under all three of his insurance policies, Farmers conceded coverage under only one of the policies.

Pickering sued Farmers to recover the medical benefits under the remaining two policies of insurance, and the district court ultimately entered a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lyon v. Walker Boudwin Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. White v. KaufmannArizona Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MEADOWBROOK, LLC v. FlowerUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Valley Electric Ass'n v. OverfieldNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fleury v. Kessel/Duff ConstructionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Davidsohn v. SteffensNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. BetsingerNevada Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API