Legal Opinion
In re Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 26, 2016No. 16-10011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
We vacate our order in this case dated January 20, 2016, and replace it with this order. Anthony Johnson has filed a pro se application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence. We can authorize such a filing only if we certify that the second or successive motion is based on either:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- In re: Octavious WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- In re JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.