Legal Opinion

W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1927No. 26603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The appellant, W. T. Raleigh Company, a corporation, filed this suit against H. L. Fortenberry for a balance of the purchase price of certain merchandise previously sold and delivered to the said Fortenberry, in pursuance of a written contract, and also against E. S. Richardson, W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett, the present appellees, as guarantors of the said Fortenberry under the terms of a written contract of guaranty. The cause was dismissed as'to Fortenberry, who was not served with process, and there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the three guarantors, and from this judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. W. T. Raleigh Co. v. FortenberryMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  2. W. T. Raleigh Co. v. FortenberryMississippi Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. GiffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. New Home Sewing MacH. Co. v. MoodyMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Thorp Finance Corp. v. TindleMississippi Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API