Legal Opinion

W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1923No. 23624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The appellant, W. T. Raleigh Company, an Illinois corporation, filed its declaration in the circuit court of Neoba county against H. L. Fortenberry for a balance of the purchase price of certain goods, wares, and merchandise theretofore sold and delivered to .the defendant, For-tenberry, in pursuance of a written contract, which was made an exhibit to the declaration, and also against E. S. Richardson, W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett,, ap-pellees, as guarantors of the said Fortenberry-under the terms of a written contract of guaranty which was also made an exhibit to the declaration. To this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. KirkMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hines v. PottsMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Yazoo & M. V. R. v. McGee-Dean Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jordan v. HerrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. DeversMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  2. W. T. Raleigh Co. v. FortenberryMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Dolan v. TateMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ransom v. HarrounMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Texas Co. v. Smith CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API