Legal Opinion

Midland Valley R. Co. v. Ezell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 2, 1917No. 6953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Osage County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by H. 6. Ezell against the Midland Valley Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Osage county by the defendant in error, who will hereinafter be called plaintiff, against the iffaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, to recover the sum of $1,792.40, damages for the loss of 93 head of cattle and damage to 52 head of cattle shipped by plaintiff from Pt. Worth, Tex., to Poraker, Okla., and transported over the line of the defendant, because of the negligence of the defendant in handling said cattle while in its possession.

The petition alleges that plaintiff, being the owner of 145 head of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. State Bank of Waterloo v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. EzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Kelly v. Okmulgee Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Mickleson v. HelmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Schaff v. HudginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Ezell v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API