Legal Opinion

Roles v. Roles

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBiRdzeul, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant on a promissory note. The defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The motion being denied, the defendant appeals to this court. The following statement of facts gleaned from the record will suffice to indicate the basis for the questions raised upon this appeal. In 1917, Nick Roles, a brother of the plaintiff, was indebted in a considerable amount to the Citizens Rank of Minot. Towards the end of the year there had been some discussion of this indebtedness between Nick Eoles and Peter Ehr, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. EwingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  2. First National Bank v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. RaeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, P.C. v. BolkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Erenfeld v. ErenfeldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Erickson v. HusemollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Lawler v. OseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Erenfeld v. ErenfeldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API