Legal Opinion

Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, P.C. v. Bolken

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1993No. Civ. 930141PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

In this case we revisit the issue of whether partial payments on an open account may toll the statute of limitations for an entire debt.

Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, P.C. [KLJ] appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its action to collect for engineering services rendered to Carl Bolken. The district court concluded KLJ’s collection action was for a simple open account and was barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

I

In July 1978, May 1982, and July 1982, KLJ performed engineering services for Bolken. 1 KLJ’s total bill for those services was $13,634.99,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pear v. Grand Forks Motel AssociatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Burr v. KulasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hawkins v. BarnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Waxler v. DalstedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API