Erickson v. Husemoller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. OLSEN, Justice.
Defendant John Baumgartner appeals from an order denying his mo-tion for a new trial.
Plaintiffs brought the action to recover on a promissory note given to them by F. W. Husemoller, Clara Husemoller, his wife, and John Baumgartner. The Husemollers did not answer or defend, and judgment on default was entered against them. John Baumgartner answered and, after trial by jury, a verdict was returned against him. He is hereinafter referred to as the defendant. The original indebtedness was for building material and a heating plant sold by plaintiffs to F. W. Husemoller in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Winchell v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Littlefield v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Willoughby v. IrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. SimserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- St. George v. LollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Bernloehr v. FredricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Parkin v. SykesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Greve v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.