Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Coffey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1931No. File No. 5922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBibdzell, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on Section 17, Township 144, North of Range 62, West of the Fifth Principal Meridian. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs the defendants, James A. Coffey and Josephine A. Coffey, appeal and demand a trial de novo. There are no issues of fact involved in the record, so a brief statement will suffice.

On November 1, 1913, the appellants here — whom we will call the defendants — gave to the state their note in the sum of $5,000.00, due. November 1, 1924, secured by a first mortgage on .the section of land above described. When the note became due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Davis v. County of McLeanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Patterson Land Co. v. Merchants' BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Davidson v. HougeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API