Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Coffey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1931No. File No. 5924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnt, J.

This is one of three cases between these same parties argued at tbe same time, and is known as case number two. It involves tbe foreclosure of a second mortgage on tbe land involved in case number one, being tbe case where tbe opinion of this court was written by Judge Birdzell, ante, 105, 237 N. W. 783.

There are three main issues to be determined — tbe legality of tbe power of attorney given for foreclosure purposes; tbe effectiveness of tbe notice before foreclosure; and the.amount of interest charged after tbe maturity of the debt.

Tbe legality of a similar power of attorney is determined…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oil Investment, Inc. v. Dallea Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API