Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Coffey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1931No. File No. 5923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBuRKE, J.

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage.

The defendant appeared generally, filing an answer admitting the making of the mortgage, and the note described in the complaint, that the same has not been paid, but denies the existence of power of attorney authorizing the foreclosing of the mortgage and denies that a notice of intention to foreclose was served upon the defendant. From a judgment of foreclosure the defendant appeals.

There are three issues involved in the case, first, that the power of attorney executed by plaintiff, Alma Lutz, by her attorney in fact is void. Second,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brewer v. ForsbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lutz v. CoffeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API