City of Bardstown v. Hurst
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 15. — PETITION BY MONROE HURST AGAINST THE CITY OF BARDSTOWN FOR A W1RIT OF PROHIBITION TO PREVENT THE POLICE JUDGE FROM TAKING JURISDICTION OF AN OFFENSE BECAUSE NOT COMMITTED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. Appeal from Nelson Circuit Court. S. E. Jones, Circuit Judge. Prom the judgment granting the writ the city appeals. (No briefs.)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Settle
Affirming.
The council, of appellant, city of Bardstown, desiring to annex to its corporate limits certain contiguous territory upon which is situated its waterworks and reservoir, on December 13, 1901, enacted an ordinance defining accurately the boundary of territory proposed to be annexed. Small parcels of the territory in question are owned by J. R. Barber, K. C. Barber and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., respectively; the remainder, by the city. After the enactment by the city council of the ordinance mentioned, it was given to the Record Printing Co.,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- McKee v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wayland Oil & Gas Co. v. RummelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lenox Land Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Garner v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.