Haklits v. Oldenburg
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C. J.
This is an action in equity to enjoin a continuing trespass and to compel the removal of a camp building which the plaintiffs claim the defendants constructed astride their south boundary. The controlling issue is the location of the common boundary between the adjoining lands of the parties. The chancellor heard the cause, filed findings of fact and entered a decree for the plaintiffs. The defendants appeal. The substance of the facts reported by the chancellor are unchallenged. The error assigned is that the facts as determined by the chancellor do not legally support the decree.
The subject…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Amey v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- D'Orazio Et Ux. v. PashbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Sowles v. MinotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fisher v. PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Braun v. HumistonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Fairbrother v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Barr v. GuaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.