Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Counsel to the plaintiff class (“Class Counsel”) in this settled class action have moved for an order awarding supplemental fees and expenses to Class Counsel. 1
For the reasons set forth below, Class Counsel’s motion will be granted, as modified herein, and Class Counsel will be directed to make final distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants as approved in this Court’s opinion of January 9, 1997. See Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co., 1997 WL 7668 (S.D.N.Y. Jan.9, 1997) (Maywalt VI).
Facts and Prior Proceedings
The facts and prior proceedings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In re Giant Interactive Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Clement v. American Honda Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Meredith Corp. v. SESAC, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- PG 1044 Madison Associates, L.L.C. v. Sirene One, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005