Legal Opinion

Retamal v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection Department of Homeland Security

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 3, 2005No. Court 03-00613Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

AQUILINO, Senior Judge:

From the beginning, the Court of International Trade has had the benefit of able advocacy by the members of its especial Bar, some of whom, more recently, have appeared in certain cases pro bono publico. That kind of participation, however, does not entail any exemption from the well-established rules of proper practice.

I

This action for judicial review of the revocation of the license of a customs broker pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §1641(g)(2) was commenced and prosecuted by the plaintiff pro se. Upon defendant’s motion, it was dismissed as time-barred per…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API