Legal Opinion

Velsor v. Freeman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion by plaintiffs for a receiver. Motion by defendants to dismiss complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

Two motions are here involved. The first is a motion by the plaintiffs for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the property belonging to one David B. Cocks at and prior to his decease and of the assets of his estate. Pending the motion the defendants are restrained from disposing of, secreting or destroying the property, books, papers or documents belonging to said deceased and any of the assets of his estate; and the defendant Helen F. Freeman is restrained from alienating or incumbering a parcel of real property situated in the state of New Jersey and which was conveyed to her by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Corley v. . McElmeelNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Frank v. MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Brady v. . McCoskerNew York Court of Appeals · 1848

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Levy v. Paramount Publix Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cole v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Bouton v. FlehartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Behrens v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API