Legal Opinion

Bouton v. Fleharty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, J.

In granting the, motion of the defendants Penfield to set the verdict aside and for a new trial, the learned court held that it was incumbent upon the defendant Swan to show either (1) a valid probate according to the law of this State (Surr. Court Act, §§ 80, 139-144), or (2) a valid judgment establishing the will (Decedent Estate Law, §§ 200-205), or (3) that the presumptive evidence of the will and of the execution thereof exists pursuant to section 44 of the Decedent Estate Law; and a new trial was directed for the purpose of giving appellant Swan an opportunity to comply with these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. In Re the Revocation of the Last Will & Testament of NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Corley v. . McElmeelNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Wallace v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Velsor v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Millard v. McFaddenNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bonds v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. In re the Estate of PaysonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1986
  4. Spence v. NiperNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API