Legal Opinion
Levy v. Paramount Publix Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
This is a motion, pursuant to Rules of Civil Practice, rule 106, for judgment dismissing the complaint as to nine individual defendants, directors of the defendant Paramount Publix Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Paramount), on the ground that in respect to said defendants the complaint does not constitute a cause of action and that the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue.
The action is a representative one brought by the holder of $5,000 of bonds of Paramount due in 1950. There is a total of more than $13,000,000 of such bonds. Plaintiff for himself and on behalf of all other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Batchelder v. Council Grove Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Greene v. New York United Hotels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- John H. Giles Dyeing MacHine Co. v. Klauder-Weldon Dyeing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Greene v. New York United Hotels, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- King v. Krischer Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. National Bank of GreeceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- John Coleman v. Golkin, Bomback & Co., Inc., a Corporation and Saul GolkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Richter v. RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Quadrant Structured Products Co. v. VertinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.