Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Samartino

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1942No. 11383PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by appellant, Edna E. Dixon, under Title 77, Articles 4671 to 4678, inclusive, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, commonly referred to as the "death statute", for the recovery of damages alleged to have resulted to her from the death of her adult son, Carl W. Dixon, caused by wounds inflicted by appellee, Charles Samartino.

Appellee answered by a general denial and exceptions. He pled in several particulars that the alleged homicide, if true, was justifiable for the reason that it was committed in the protection of his person against an unlawful attack committed upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LehmbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Koons v. RookTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Lykins v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Grizzle, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1982
  2. Borak v. BridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Rowan & Hope v. ValadezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Bradford v. Fort Worth Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Airline Motor Coaches, Inc. v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API