Legal Opinion

Miller v. Frederick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1933No. 24087. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for fraud. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand dollars. The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which motions were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendants appeal.

The facts áre these: The Roy I. Frederick Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, with its principal place of business in the city of Tacoma. The capital stock of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duffy v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Boehme v. Broadway Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hahn v. BrickellWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam HotelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API