Legal Opinion
Spiess v. Brandt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1950No. 34,992Published
1Opinion of the Court
230 Minn. 246 (1950)
MAURICE SPIESS AND ANOTHER
v.
WILLIAM ARTHUR BRANDT AND ANOTHER.[1]
No. 34,992.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
February 17, 1950.
Fryberger, Fulton & Boyle and Doherty, Rumble, Butler & Mitchell, for appellants.
James J. Courtney & Son, for respondents.
MATSON, JUSTICE.
Defendants appeal from an order denying a new trial in an action for the rescission, because of fraudulent representations, of a contract for the purchase of defendants' summer resort.
Defendants, father and son, in 1940 acquired Jameson's Wilderness Resort located 18 miles north of Hovland, Minnesota, on Lake…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Forman v. HamilburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.