Legal Opinion
Shamsuddin v. Vitamin Research Products
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 30, 2004No. CIV. AMD 04-1634PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, AbulKalam M. Shamsuddin, M.D., Ph.D. (“Dr.Shamsuddin”) and Pro prietary Nutritionals, Inc. (“PNI”), brought ■ a patent infringement action against defendant.Vitamin Research Prod-: ucts (“VRP”), a company,organized under the laws of Nevada. Now pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, or, alternatively, to-transfer venue. - The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md. 2004). For the reasons stated herein, I am persuaded that personal jurisdiction…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pervasive Software, Inc. v. Lexware GMBH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Karstetter v. Voss, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Cleaning Authority, Inc. v. NeubertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. v. Go Satellite Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.