Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. v. Go Satellite Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge.
The court must decide whether it can exercise in personam jurisdiction over two Canadian defendants and whether this case should be dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Concluding that the court can exercise in person-am jurisdiction and that the suit should not be dismissed based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens, the court denies defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I
This is an action by plaintiffs Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. (“TP International”), Tempur-Pedic Management, Inc. (“TP Management”), Tempur-Pedic…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford v. Mentor Worldwide, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Hawbecker v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Van Rooyen v. Greystone Home Builders, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
- 721 Bourbon, Inc. v. House of Auth, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- American University System, Inc. v. American UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.