Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. L. Beinhauer & Son Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1976No. Appeal, No. 696 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

L. Beinhauer & Son Company appeals from an order of the State Board of Funeral Directors (Board) rejecting the licensee’s application for two branch office licenses. We affirm.

On June 1,1921, the appellant corporation received its license to practice undertaking in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. At that time it maintained funeral homes at three separate locations in the City of Pittsburgh: downtown on Sixth Avenue, on the South Side on Bradish Street, and on West Liberty Avenue. The downtown office was subsequently moved twice before it was finally closed down in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Flynn v. HorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mulberry Market, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, Board of License & Inspection ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Donato v. State Board of Funeral DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. H. P. Brandt Funeral Home, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. L. Beinhauer & Son Co. v. State Board of Funeral DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API