Dillard v. City of Greensboro
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
This ease presents our circuit’s first opportunity to reexamine the drawing of voting districts following the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. Johnson, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2475, 132 L.Ed.2d 762 (1995). Because the district court did not have the benefit of Miller when it adopted the challenged redistricting plan, we remand the ease to allow the district court to reevaluate the plan under Miller.
I. BACKGROUND
Over a decade ago, this case originated as a class-action brought by black citizens of Alabama (“Dillard”) to challenge the at-large voting systems 1 used to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rogers v. LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. Calhoun County, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996
- Dillard v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Dillard v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- Dillard v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.