Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Krueger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The defendant paid the automobile expenses on the trip. The plaintiff was, by her own pleadings and under the facts, defendant’s guest. As such guest she took the automobile and the defendant as driver as they were. Plaintiff knew defendant’s prior experience as a driver as well as all the facts surrounding the long drive from noon of the preceding day; the loss of sleep; the discomforts of the night preceding the final stage of the journey. She was bound to know as a matter of common knowl*590edge that a result such as did follow, viz. of the defendant dozing at the wheel, was reasonably to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Cleary v. EckartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Oppenheim v. BarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Olson v. HermansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Manning v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NygrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Knipfer v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Boos v. SauerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API