State v. Gonzalez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentWarren, J.
I agree with the majority that there was no violation of ORS 132.580 and no need to impose sanctions under that statute. Nevertheless, because I disagree with its conclusion that medical records do not come within the protection of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, I dissent.
Under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution:
“A search or seizure to obtain evidence of a crime is unconstitutional if no warrant authorized the search or seizure and there is no exigency that would obviate the need for a warrant.” State v. Campbell, 306 Or 157, 162, 759 P2d 1040 (1988).
The state…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. OwczarzakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. WackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992