Legal Opinion

Singer v. Metz Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1919No. 15258PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered October 24, 1918, granting a new trial, after the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Singer, seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries which it is claimed resulted to him from the negligent driving af an automobile owned by the defendant, the Metz Company, while being driven by an employee of that company in the course of his employment. Trial upon the merits *563in. the superior court for King county, sitting with a jury, resulted in a verdict in favor of the Metz Company, following which the court entered an order awarding Singer a new trial, upon his motion made in that behalf, which order was by the trial court, as stated therein, rested upon the ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Briglio v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Singer v. Metz Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Anning v. Rothschild & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hufford v. CicovichWashington Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API