Legal Opinion

Hufford v. Cicovich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1955No. 33256PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is a smoke damage case. Plaintiffs Charles Hufford and wife operated an apparel store in Tacoma, and plaintiff Pacific Outfitting Company, a corporation, operated another such store. Both stores fronted on Broadway in a building which extends from that street to Commerce street, the entrances to the stores on Broadway being on a considerably higher level than the Commerce street entrances. The defendant, George B. Cicovich, operated a restaurant and cocktail lounge on the Commerce street level directly beneath the stores operated by the plaintiffs.

Shortly before midnight on September…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Wintersteen v. SemlerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Phennah v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Hertz v. FiscusIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Scott v. Rainbow Ambulance Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Shinn v. Thrust IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API