Legal Opinion

Doylestown Processing Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1979No. Appeal, No. 586 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

A workmen’s compensation referee found that tbe disability suffered by Mario Diaz (claimant), as a result of bis work-related injury of December 26, 1973, ceased as of March 4, 1974. Thus, tbe referee found that Doylestown Processing Co. (employer) bad sustained its burden of proving that tbe claimant’s disability bad ceased and granted tbe employer’s petition for termination. Tbe Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), without taking evidence, set aside tbe determination of tbe referee and remanded tbe case to tbe referee to provide tbe claimant “an opportunity to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Flynn v. Asten Hill Manufacturing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Merryman v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bechtel Power Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API