Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Ozenberger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1992No. WD 45262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The plaintiff Kimberly McClelland sued the defendant Dr. Larry Ozenberger for medical malpractice. Dr. Ozenberger attended McClelland during her pregnancy and delivery. In order to prevent adjacent tears in the birth canal when the baby’s head emerged, Dr. Ozenberger performed an episiotomy, which is an incision in the genital area. After she left the hospital, McClelland noticed occasional loose stool and drainage from her vagina. She saw Dr. Saleh, a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology, who diagnosed the condition as a rectovaginal fistula. Dr. Saleh referred McClelland…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Adelsberger v. SheehySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Griggs v. AB Chance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Laclede Investment Corp. v. KaiserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Pike v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oldaker v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Bellon Wrecking & Salvage Co. v. David Orf, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Brown v. KirkhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ironite Products Co., Inc. v. SamuelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Vallejo-Davila v. Osco Drug, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API