Legal Opinion
United States v. Buffalo Coal Mining Company
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 4, 1959No. A-12052, A-12273PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCARREY, District Judge.
Claim for relief No. A-12,052 has been consolidated with No. A-12,273, in conformance with the rules, and without objection.
The subject of this opinion is not related to claim No. A-12,273. Therefore, no reference will be made thereto.
The United States has sued the Buffalo Coal Mining Company, Inc., an Alaska corporation, hereinafter referred to as Buffalo, Buell Nesbett, W. T. Malcolm, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Yukon Equipment Company, Inc., Gould and Gould, Inc., Sisters of Charity of the House of Providence, and Morris Steel Products Company, a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. County of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- United States v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. Sherman Gardens CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1967
- United States v. Ameco Electronic CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.