Legal Opinion

Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball Sons

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1957No. S. F. 19563Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 Cal.2d 141 (1957)

LEWIS AND QUEEN (a Partnership) et al., Appellants,

v.

N. M. BALL SONS (a Partnership) et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 19563.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 19, 1957.

Howard B. Crittenden, Jr., for Appellants.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Gordon Johnson and Dario De Benedictis for Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiffs George W. Lewis and Paul C. Queen are engaged in the contracting business as the partnership of Lewis and Queen, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff. Defendant Ball Sons, hereinafter referred to as defendant, is also in the contracting business.

In…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API