In re V
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion by the petitioner to confirm the report of a referee appointed to take proof and report to the court • with his opinion upon an application to strike the name of B_"V"_ from the roll of attorneys and counselors of the Supreme Court, and to forbid his practicing in any of the courts of this State.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.;
The petition, which forms the basis of this proceeding, was made by Charles Hewlett, a resident of the county of Queens in this State. Four charges of misconduct upon the part of the respondent are set forth in the petition, with particular specifications in connection with each charge. Upon this petition an order was obtained from the General Term of this court requiring the respondent to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors of the Supreme Court, and why he should not be debarred from practicing in any of the courts of this State.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of EldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- People v. . SimonsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Judson v. Flushing Jockey ClubNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Wood v. NesbittNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Wood v. NesbittNew York Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baker v. KilburnNew York Supreme Court · 1912
- Bormay v. RessNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- In re HawesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re HawesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915