Legal Opinion

In re Hawes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1915Published

Application on the report of official referee upon charges against the respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, for professional misconduct.

1Per curiam

The respondent has been charged by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York with a number of acts of pro*645fessional misconduct, as to a majority of which charges the official referee has reported that in his opinion they have been sustained. A careful examination of the evidence and exhibits has convinced us that no other conclusion could have been arrived at.

The first two charges may be conveniently considered together. They relate to a false affidavit made by the respondent as to the service of a citation issued out of the Surrogate’s Court, and false testimony given before that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re VAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API