Legal Opinion

Bormay v. Ress

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by plaintiff as assignee of William E. Bonynge to recover fees as stenographer.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is to recover fees earned by taking stenographic notes of evidence in a proceeding instituted by the defendant Waldron to disbar the defendant Van Ress. Mr. William F. Bonynge, the plaintiff’s assignor, was selected to act as stenographer by the consent of both defendants. He took notes of the testimony, furnished one copy to the referee and one to each of the defendants. They accepted the stenographic services, knowing that Bonynge, the stenographer, expected compensation therefor from them. Indeed, the defendants were the only persons who *600benefited by Ms services, and to whom he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re OrtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Harry v. HiltonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  3. Coale v. SuckertAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  4. In re VAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Thornton v. TuttleNew York Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McReynolds v. MangerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API