Legal Opinion
Klem v. County of Santa Clara
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 3, 2000No. 98-16844PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiffs, who are managers and registered nurses employed by defendant County of Santa Clara, filed actions seeking overtime pay under the FLSA. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that it could correct its failures to comply with the relevant administrative rules through the regulatory “window of correction.” The district court issued an order denying the motion and granting Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment and certified its order for interlocutory appeal under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Block v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lessie Anderson v. Cagle's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Torres v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Rex L. Bothell v. Phase Metrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.