Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Perrin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1894No. 181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan. This was an action by Edward B. Wilson and others against George T. Bruen, in which a writ of garnishment was issued against Joel J. Perrin, to whom Bruen had given a mortgage of his goods. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff against defendant Bruen, but on trial of the issue as to Perrin the judge directed the jury to find for him, and judgment for Perrin was entered on the verdict.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan. This was an action by Edward B. Wilson and others against George T. Bruen, in which a writ of garnishment was issued against Joel J. Perrin, to whom Bruen had given a mortgage of his goods. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff against defendant Bruen, but on trial of the issue as to Perrin the judge directed the jury to find for him, and judgment for Perrin was entered on the verdict. Plaintiffs brought error.

1Opinion of the Court

BURTON, Circuit Judge.

The question involved upon this writ of error concerns the validity of a certain chattel mortgage executed by George T. Bruen, who was a merchant doing business in the city of Kalamazoo, Mich., to the appellee, Joel J. Perrin. It was made for the purpose of securing an indebtedness of $14,-974.36, which amount was due by Bruen to Perrin. The property mortgaged consisted of the entire stock of dry goods, with the furniture and other fixtures usually found in a dry-goods store, and also two horses, a buggy, a cutter, and certain harness. It was made on the 31st day of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Means v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Smith v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. Williams v. GaylordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  4. In Re CunninghamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API