Legal Opinion
In Re Cunningham
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1932No. File No. 6062PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing an appeal from an order of the Board of County Commissioners of Bichland county denying the application of J. P. Cunningham for a refund of taxes paid under protest.
The facts are stipulated. Erom this stipulation the following facts appear: The city of Tlanldnson is a municipal corporation. In 1920 a special improvement district, including the whole of the city, was created in order to enable the city to construct a water system. The improvement was made. In November, 1920, special assessment warrants were issued to pay for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Detroit v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Nelson v. Police Jury of St. Martin's ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Stutsman County v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Stryker v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schieber v. City of MohallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- G. W. Jones Lumber Co. v. City of MarmarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Mohall v. First Nat. Bank of Sleepy EyeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939