Legal Opinion

Franks v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2011No. 10AP-770PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connor, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Jerry Franks (“appellant”), appeals the decision of the Court of Claims of Ohio granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“ODRC”). For the following reasons, we reverse.

{¶ 2} Appellant is an inmate at the London Correctional Institution (“LCI”) pursuant to R.C. 5120.16. Appellant alleges that he has a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease, suffers from severe muscle spasms, and undergoes chemotherapy. Ac*117cording to appellant, these conditions make it difficult for him to climb stairs.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Zhelezny v. OleshOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Frash v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Frash v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Jackson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Allen v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API