Legal Opinion
Kang v. The Boeing Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 21, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00294Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 JANE KANG, Case No. 2:24-cv-00294-RSM 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 v. 13 THE BOEING COMPANY, 14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Boeing’s Motion for Summary 18 19 Judgment. Dkt #27. Plaintiff Jane Kang opposes. Dkt. #39. Neither party has requested oral 20 argument. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Boeing’s Motion. 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 Jane Kang was employed by Boeing from 2010 to 2021. She was first hired as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.